0.11/0.28	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.28	% Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
0.13/0.50	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.13/0.50	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.50	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.50	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.50	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.50	% CPULimit   : 300
0.13/0.50	% WCLimit    : 300
0.13/0.50	% DateTime   : Fri Jul  5 04:21:39 EDT 2024
0.13/0.50	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.52	This is a THF_ problem
0.13/0.52	Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000  -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.13/0.54	% (17168)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/96Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17169)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/36Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17172)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/17Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17171)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/385Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17170)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17173)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/74Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17175)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/915Mi)
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.54	% (17169)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.54	
0.13/0.54	
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.13/0.54	% (17169)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.13/0.54	% (17169)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17169)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17172)First to succeed.
0.13/0.54	% (17168)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.54	% (17175)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.54	
0.13/0.54	
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
0.13/0.54	% (17175)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.13/0.54	% (17175)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17175)------------------------------
0.13/0.54	% (17172)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.13/0.54	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.13/0.54	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_2, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_3, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_4, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_5, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_6, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_7, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_8, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_9, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_10, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_11, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_12, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_13, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_14, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_28, type, sK0: $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_29, type, sK1: $i > $o).
0.13/0.54	thf(func_def_31, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.13/0.54	thf(f121,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  $false),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f69,f74,f109,f110,f117,f118,f120])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f120,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true != (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($false != (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = $false)),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f118,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true != (sK1 @ sK4)) | ((sK1 @ sK4) != $false) | ($true = $false)),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f117,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_6 | spl2_4 | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f85,f66,f101,f112])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f112,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_6 <=> ($false = (sK0 @ sK4))),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_6])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f101,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_4 <=> ($true = (sK1 @ sK4))),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f66,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_1 <=> ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))) | (sK1 @ Y0))) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f85,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | ($false = (sK0 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f84])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f84,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($false = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($false = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f82])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f82,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | ($false = (sK0 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f81])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f81,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ((~ (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | ($false = (sK0 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f80])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f80,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($false = ((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4)))) | (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f78])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f78,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($false = (((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4))) | (sK1 @ sK4))) | (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f76])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f76,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) != (((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4))) | (sK1 @ sK4))) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f75])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f75,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))) @ sK4) != ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))) | (sK1 @ Y0))) @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f68])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f68,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))) | (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0)))) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f66])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f110,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_5 | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f88,f66,f105])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f105,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_5 <=> ((sK1 @ sK4) = $false)),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_5])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f88,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ((sK1 @ sK4) = $false) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f86])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f86,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ((sK1 @ sK4) = $false) | ((sK1 @ sK4) = $false) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f79])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f79,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  (((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4)) = $false) | ((sK1 @ sK4) = $false) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f78])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f109,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_3 | spl2_4 | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f94,f66,f101,f97])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f97,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_3 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK4))),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f94,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f93])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f93,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f91])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f91,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = ((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4)))) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f90])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f90,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = ((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4)))) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f89])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f89,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = ((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4))) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | ($true = ((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4)))) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f77])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f77,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true = (((sK0 @ sK4) & (~ (sK1 @ sK4))) | (sK1 @ sK4))) | ($true = ((sK0 @ sK4) | (sK1 @ sK4))) | spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f76])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f74,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ~spl2_2),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f17,f71])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f71,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  spl2_2 <=> ($true = $false)),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f17,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ($true != $false)),
0.13/0.54	  introduced(fool_axiom,[])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f69,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ~spl2_1),
0.13/0.54	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f64,f66])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f64,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))) | (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))),
0.13/0.54	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f63])).
0.13/0.54	thf(f63,plain,(
0.13/0.54	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))) @ sK1 @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1)) != ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))) @ sK1 @ sK0))),
0.13/0.54	  inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f60,f61,f61,f52])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f52,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (setminus = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f23,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (setminus = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f22])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f22,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (setminus = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(rectify,[],[f9])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f9,axiom,(
0.13/0.55	  (setminus = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o, X3 : $i] : (~(X2 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3))))),
0.13/0.55	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminus)).
0.13/0.55	thf(f61,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (union = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f19,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (union = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f18])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f18,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  (union = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2))))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f6,axiom,(
0.13/0.55	  (union = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o, X3 : $i] : ((X0 @ X3) | (X2 @ X3))))),
0.13/0.55	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union)).
0.13/0.55	thf(f60,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  ((union @ sK1 @ sK0) != (union @ sK1 @ (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1)))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f46,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  ((union @ sK1 @ sK0) != (union @ sK1 @ (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1)))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f44,f45])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f45,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : ((union @ X1 @ X0) != (union @ X1 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1))) => ((union @ sK1 @ sK0) != (union @ sK1 @ (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1)))),
0.13/0.55	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f44,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : ((union @ X1 @ X0) != (union @ X1 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f43,plain,(
0.13/0.55	  ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : ((union @ X1 @ X0) = (union @ X1 @ (setminus @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f16,negated_conjecture,(
0.13/0.55	  ~! [X2 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o] : ((union @ X0 @ (setminus @ X2 @ X0)) = (union @ X0 @ X2))),
0.13/0.55	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15])).
0.13/0.55	thf(f15,conjecture,(
0.13/0.55	  ! [X2 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o] : ((union @ X0 @ (setminus @ X2 @ X0)) = (union @ X0 @ X2))),
0.13/0.55	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm)).
0.13/0.55	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.13/0.55	% (17172)------------------------------
0.13/0.55	% (17172)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.13/0.55	% (17172)Termination reason: Refutation
0.13/0.55	
0.13/0.55	% (17172)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.55	% (17172)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
0.13/0.55	% (17172)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.13/0.55	% (17172)------------------------------
0.13/0.55	% (17172)------------------------------
0.13/0.55	% (17167)Success in time 0.009 s
0.13/0.55	% Vampire---4.8 exiting
0.13/0.55	EOF